Yipei, Probably you may be interested in the following section in Blueprint [1].
7.1 AZ and Pod Binding ... 7.x [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit#heading=h.x14kdooqhai1 Cheers, S On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yipei, > > According to Chaoyi, you have a bunch of experiences regarding to the > OpenStack, networking which is awesome. > > I look forward to hearing from you soon. > > Cheers, > Shinobu > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Yipei Niu <newy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Got it with thanks. >> >> Best regards, >> Yipei >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:48 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Yipei, >>> >>> Shinobu is correct, this should be taken into consideration in the design >>> of dynamic pod binding. >>> >>> How to schedule pod, you can refer to host-aggregate scheduling with >>> flavor, the difference is that the scheduling granularity is on pod level. >>> By the tag in flavor extra-spec and volume type extrac_spec , tricircle can >>> be aware of which type of resource the tenant wants to provision. >>> >>> For example: >>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/4/html/Configuration_Reference_Guide/host-aggregates.html >>> >>> So in >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit, >>> one field called resource_affinity_tag is proposed to be added into the pod >>> table, it could be used for scheduling purpose. But this is only one >>> proposal, you may have better idea to do that, after the spec is reviewed >>> and approved, the doc can be update to reflect the new idea. >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:06 AM >>> To: Yipei Niu >>> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); >>> joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai; 金城 忍 >>> Subject: Re: [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding >>> >>> Hi Yipei, >>> >>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Yipei Niu <newy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi, all, >>> > >>> > For dynamic pod binding, I have some questions. >>> > >>> [snip] >>> > 3. How is Tricircle aware of what type of resource wanted by tenants? >>> > For example, a tenant wants to boot VMs for CAD modelling with >>> > corresponding flavor. But in current code, the flavorRef is not get >>> > involved in function get_pod_by_az_tenant, when querying pod bindings. >>> > So do we need to modify the pod binding table to add such a column? >>> >>> Working through code bases, probably you are talking about future >>> implementation, I guess. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Shinobu >>> >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > Yipei >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Email: >>> shin...@linux.com >>> shin...@redhat.com >> >> > > > > -- > Email: > shin...@linux.com > shin...@redhat.com -- Email: shin...@linux.com shin...@redhat.com __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev