I'm trying Kuryr with networking-calico and think I've hit an unhelpful
inconsistency. A Neutron port has 'id' and 'device_id' fields that are
usually different. When Nova does VIF binding for a Neutron port, it
generates the Linux device name from 'tap' + port['id']. But when Kuryr
does VIF binding for a Neutron port, I think it generates the Linux
device name from 'tap' + port['device_id'].
Thoughts? Does that sound right, or have I misread the code and my
logs? If it's correct, it marginally impacts the ability to use
identical agent and Neutron driver/plugin code for the two cases (Nova
and Kuryr).
Thanks,
Neil
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
