>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less >> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the >> value of being google indexed).
Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world. I'm definitely bummed at the thought of losing it. > The Google indexing is also what makes the wiki so painful... After 6 > years most of the content there is inaccurate or outdated. It's a > massive effort to clean it up without breaking the Google juice, and > nobody has the universal knowledge to determine if pages are still > accurate or not. We are bitten every day by newcomers finding wrong > information on the wiki and acting using it. It's getting worse every > day we keep on using it. Sure, I think we all feel the pain of the stale information on the wiki. What if we were to do what we do for bug or review purges and make a list of pages, in reverse order of how recently they've been updated? Then we can have a few sprints to tag obviously outdated things to purge, and perhaps some things that just need some freshening. There are a lot of nova-related things on the wiki that are the prehistory equivalent of specs, most of which are very misleading to people about the current state of things. I would think we could purge a ton of stuff like that pretty quickly. I'll volunteer to review such a list from the nova perspective. > * Deprecate the current wiki and start over with another wiki (with > stronger ACL support ?) I'm somewhat surprised that this is an issue, because I thought that the wiki requires an ubuntu login. Are spammers really getting ubuntu logins so they can come over and deface our wiki? --Dan __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev