On 2016-05-12 17:38:22 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote: > On 5/12/16 8:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > > While the size I picked in item #2 at > > <URL: > > https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/vulnerability_managed.html#requirements > > > > > is not meant to be a strict limit, you may still want to take this > > as an opportunity to rotate out some of your less-active reviewers > > (if there are any). > > Thanks for not being strict on it.
It's also possible this is an indication that we put the recommended cap too low, and should revisit it. I'll bring it up with other VMT members. I sort of picked that number out of the air... it seemed reasonable based on a survey of the sizes of some other supported projects' -coresec teams, but that's certainly worth revisiting. > I do however, want to make another proposal: > > Since Stuart is our VMT liaison and he's on hiatus, can we add Brian as > his substitute. As soon as Stuart is back and is ready to shoulder this > responsibility we should do the rotation. [...] This seems fine. It does make sense to not expose embargoed vulnerabilities to (even temporarily) inactive team members, as a matter of hygiene. -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
