On 05/13/2016 08:23 AM, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:58:08PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: >> What's wrong with pymemcache, that we picked for tooz and are using for >> 2 years now? >> >> https://github.com/pinterest/pymemcache > > Looks like a good alternative.
Honestly, nobody should be using pymemcache or python-memcached or pylibmc for anything caching related in OpenStack. People should be using oslo.cache - however, if that needs work before it's usable, people should be using dogpile.cache, which is what oslo.cache uses on the backend. dogpile is pluggable, so it means that the backend used for caching can be chosen in a much broader manner. As morgan mentions elsewhere, that means that people who want to use a different memcache library just need to write a dogpile driver. Please don't anybody directly use memcache libraries for caching in OpenStack. Please. Monty __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
