Why is that?
Thank you,
Mark
On 5/13/2016 7:21 PM, Dieterly, Deklan wrote:
If we allow Go, then we should also consider allowing JVM based languages.
-- Deklan Dieterly Senior Systems Software Engineer HPE On 5/13/16,
2:10 PM, "Adam Young" <ayo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>Can we just up and support Go, please? I'm a C++ and C buff, but I
>would not inflict either of those on other people, nor would I want to
>support their code. Go is designed to be native but readable/writable.
>
>
>There is nothing perfect in this world.
>
>Python for most things.
>Javascript for web out of necessity
>Go for native tuning.
>
>Yes, Flapper, I like Rust, too, but we have to pick something, and I am
>not the one trying to code this.
>
>It makes sense. Go is already packaged for Fedora and Debian. We can
>deal with it.
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
