> -----Original Message----- > From: Lucas Alvares Gomes [mailto:lucasago...@gmail.com] > What I don't think we should do is say that the library's _right now_ > ready for it, the interfaces we have at the moment should not be > considered stable, Ironic is very opinionated in many aspects > (specially when partitioning the disk), there's no documentation, no > release notes, etc...
I agree with Lucas on this. From my recollection the initial reason for ironic-lib was to get rid of the duplication in code between openstack/ironic and openstack/ironic-python-agent. So it seemed like an internal usage library to me. I think we should add warnings to that effect until such time that we want to make it more official library with a stable API. John __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
