On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:49:26AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > > On 19 May 2016, at 02:12, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:07:48PM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> Hi stable-maint-core and all, > >> > >> I would like to propose Brian for neutron specific stable team. > > > > +1 > > > > It'd be nice to see some comments on the reviews to indicate that the > > various > > aspects of the policy have been thought about. > > > > I know it gets a little repetitive but it's hard to assess the quality of > > reviews without it :/ > > Meh. I am not sure we want to follow the rabbit into the deep hole.
Fair enough. We can agree to disagree ;P > I say, people working with the person in question are in the best position to > judge. If you don’t pay attention to neutron branches (rightfully so!), > obviously it’s hard to assess. Of course. I agree with you. > That’s why we should have some sense of delegation in our stable team > hierarchy (stable-maint-core doing initial sanity checks, details left up to > project specific teams). You say "should" here, which confuses me a little as I thought that's exactly what we did. Where do you feel like we should delegate, that we aren't? Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
