On Tue, May 24 2016, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > For recent example, there has been a lot of talk about reimplementing features > from Barbican in Magnum, Keystone, etc, and not wanting to depend on Barbican. > In the pre-tent days, we'd just fix Barbican to do the things we all need it > to, and then start depending on it. Then, everyone could start depending on a > solid secret store being there since everyone would deploy it because they > would want at least one thing that depends on it.
Sorry, but before Big Tent, it was impossible to have an integrated project depending of a non-integrated project. So what you're imagining was even less likely to happen. -- Julien Danjou -- Free Software hacker -- https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
