Hi Cathy, Thanks your response. Another question, how to create different port-chains for different tenants, and these chains consist of the same port pair group. In my test scenario, port-pair-group created by tenant A is not visible for tenant B.
Regards, Juno Zhu IBM China Development Labs (CDL) Cloud IaaS Lab Email: [email protected] 5F, Building 10, 399 Keyuan Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China (201203) From: Cathy Zhang <[email protected]> To: Na Zhu/China/IBM@IBMCN, Henry Fourie <[email protected]>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <[email protected]> Cc: Ryan Moats <[email protected]>, Kyle Mestery <[email protected]>, Russell Bryant <[email protected]>, Richard Theis <[email protected]>, Stephen Wong <[email protected]>, Vikram Choudhary <[email protected]>, Farhad Sunavala <[email protected]>, "John McDowall" <[email protected]> Date: 2016/06/28 12:29 Subject: RE: Change in openstack/networking-sfc[master]: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver Hi Na, Please see inline for my reply. Cathy -----Original Message----- From: Na Zhu (Code Review) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 8:08 PM To: Henry Fourie Cc: Ryan Moats; Na Zhu; Kyle Mestery; Russell Bryant; Richard Theis; Stephen Wong; Cathy Zhang; Vikram Choudhary; Farhad Sunavala; John McDowall Subject: Change in openstack/networking-sfc[master]: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver Na Zhu has posted comments on this change. Change subject: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333172/1/doc/source/sfc_ovn_driver.rst File doc/source/sfc_ovn_driver.rst: Line 88: +---------+ +---------+ outport +===========+ > Agree that it is better to clarify these points. Hi Cathy, I try to create multiple port-chains with the same port-pair-group, it failed. I think it is not allowed to do what you said, right? (neutron) port-chain-create --flow-classifier fc --port-pair-group pg1 pc1 Port Pair Group(s) [u'17c9a0a5-a38f-4a75-834e-9aa213cd431f'] in use by Port Chain f3af530f-210a-4c51-9a02-f1835d5b1d85. Neutron server returns request_ids: ['req-47e6a39b-677a-4ce3-9976-5dfcee0ac47f'] (neutron) Cathy> when a port pair group is shared by multiple chains, these chains should be different, which means these chains should consist of different sequences of port pair groups. For example, chain 1 consists of <port-pair-group1, port-pair-group2> and chain 2 consists of "port-pair-group1, port-pair-group3, port-pair-group4>. But if the two chains are the same, i.e. they consist of the same sequence of port-pair-groups (e.g. the two chains both consist of <port-pair-group1>), then it is not allowed since it does not make sense to create the same chain twice. Maybe your test scenario falls into the second case? -- To view, visit https://review.openstack.org/333172 To unsubscribe, visit https://review.openstack.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I5c1827dcc81e48983a41120ec08983c571c5b2e9 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: openstack/networking-sfc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Louis Fourie <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Farhad Sunavala <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: John McDowall <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Kyle Mestery <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Louis Fourie <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Na Zhu <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Theis <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Russell Bryant <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Ryan Moats <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Stephen Wong <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: cathy <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: vikram.choudhary <[email protected]> Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
