On 6/29/2016 6:40 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:



On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, at 09:27 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote:
How about I sync updated_at and created_at in my patch, and leave the
finish to the other BP, by this way, I can use updated_at for the
timestamp filter I added and it don't need to change again once the
finish BP is complete.

Sounds good to me.


It's been a long day so my memory might be fried, but the options we talked about in the API meeting were:

1. Setting updated_at = created_at when the instance action record is created. Laski likes this, I'm not crazy about it, especially since we don't do that for anything else.

2. Update the instance action's updated_at when instance action events are created. I like this since the instance action is like a parent resource and the event is the child, so when we create/modify an event we can consider it an update to the parent. Laski thought this might be weird UX given we don't expose instance action events in the REST API unless you're an admin. This is also probably not something we'd do for other related resources like server groups and server group members (but we don't page on those either right now).

3. Order the results by updated_at,created_at so that if updated_at isn't set for older records, created_at will be used. I think we all agreed in the meeting to do this regardless of #1 or #2 above.

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to