+1 while I know that we weren't actually good at freezing features, we were young project. Right now we're more mature and I think we can deal with feature freeze.
On 30 June 2016 at 19:56, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'd like the release management team to take on releases of Kolla. This > means applying for the release:managed[1] tag. Please vote +1 if you wish > to proceed, or –1 if you don’t wish to proceed. The most complex part of > this change will be that when feature freeze happens, we must actually > freeze all feature development. We as a team haven't been super good at > this in the past, but I am confident we could hold to that set of rules if > the core team is in agreement on this vote. > > I will leave voting open or 1 week until July 8th. If a majority is reached > prior to that date, I will close voting early and submit governance changes. > > Note the release team would have to accept our application, so even though > we may decide to vote to be release:managed, it is ultimately up to the > discretion of the release management team whether we meet the criteria and > if they have the bandwidth to work with our release liason. > > [1] > https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/tags/release_managed.rst > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev