pybrctl repo is at: https://github.com/udragon/pybrctl It is in pypi.
Looks like a wrapper around the shell brctl commands. I don't think it would buy us anything more than what moving neutron's current implementation of doing brctl commands to neutron-lib would do. In fact, it might end up costing more. That's just my very uninformed opinion though. Thanks, Brandon On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 23:59 +0000, Bhatia, Manjeet S wrote: > Hi, > > There is work in progress for pure python driven linux network > configuration. I think most > of work will be done with this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c > /155631/ . The only > thing left after this will be linux bridge configuration, Which I > would like to discuss with > community. There are two ways at the moment I can think to do that > implementation, > First, use pybrctl which may need some changes in library itself in > order for full support. > It will clean up the code from neutron. But looking pybrctl code > which is just executing > Shell commands, another solution which Brandon Logan discussed is > move the existing > Code for executing those commands to neutron-lib, which I think is > better solution. I would > like to have views of community, especially people working neutron- > lib about moving > python code for executing brctl commands to neutron-lib. > > > Thanks and Regards ! > Manjeet Singh Bhatia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
