On 08/01/2016 09:58 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Thierry, Ben, Doug, > > How can we distinguish between. "Project is doing the right thing, but > others are not joining" vs "Project is actively trying to keep people > out"?
I think at some level, it's not really that different. If we treat them as different, everyone will always believe they did all the right things, but got no results. 3 cycles should be plenty of time to drop single entity contributions below 90%. That means prioritizing bugs / patches from outside groups (to drop below 90% on code commits), mentoring every outside member that provides feedback (to drop below 90% on reviews), shifting development resources towards mentoring / docs / on ramp exercises for others in the community (to drop below 90% on core team). Digging out of a single vendor status is hard, and requires making that your top priority. If teams aren't interested in putting that ahead of development work, that's fine, but that doesn't make it a sustainable OpenStack project. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev