Hi Thomas, If I'm not mistaken, pydot-ng [1] has been made by ex-fueler in order to overcome some limitations of pydot ( and do not change much. If pydotplus is alive project and do the same thing, I vote for using it in Fuel.
Thanks, Igor [1]: https://pypi.io/project/pydot-ng/ On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Fuel uses pydot-ng, and (at least) taskflow uses pydotplus. I believe > both aren't using pydot because that's dead upstream. > > Could we have a bit of consistency here, and have one or the other > component to switch, so we could get rid of one more package that does > the same thing in downstream distros? > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
