Hi, On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: > Ideally, I would love to see: > > for node in nodes: > ssh $node puppet apply blah-blah > > Maybe we're not there, but it only means we have to improve our puppet > modules.
This is the same thought I had, Shouldn't the config be just a call to a manifest? The undercloud should be a simple install process with some config (or image based deployment). Using Heat to deploy the undercloud means involves bootstrapping a Heat environment. I believe Ansible feels like a much better fit for this. What would the user/administrator want? Is customization of the undercloud something realistically happening? regards, Gerard -- Gerard Braad | http://gbraad.nl [ Doing Open Source Matters ] __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
