On 8/29/2016 8:29 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:

I completely agree with this. However I have some memory of us saying(in
Austin?) that adding volume_type would be acceptable since it's a clear
oversight in the list of parameters for specifying a block device. So
while I greatly dislike Nova creating volumes and would rather users
pass in pre-created volume ids I would support adding this parameter. I
do not support continuing to add parameters if Cinder adds parameters
though.



Correct, Chet Burgess brought this up on Friday in Austin and we agreed to let this in. I don't think a spec ever showed up in Newton for it though.

The notes were in this etherpad:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-bfv-volume-type

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to