Hi Yujun,
From: Yujun Zhang
Date: Monday, 29 August 2016 at 11:59
entities:
- type: switch
name: switch-1
id: switch-1 # should be same as name
state: available
relationships:
- type: nova.host
name: host-1
id: host-1 # should be same as name
is_source: true # entity is `source` in this relationship
relation_type: attached
- type: switch
name: switch-2
id: switch-2 # should be same as name
is_source: false # entity is `target` in this relationship
relation_type: backup
I think that’s the idea, instead of making this assumption in the code.
But I wonder why the static physical configuration file use a different format
from vitrage template definitions[1]
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/vitrage/blob/master/doc/source/vitrage-template-format.rst
What do you mean? The purpose of the templates is to describe the
condition-action behaviour, wheres the purpose of the static configuration is
to define resources to be added to vitrage graph. Can you please explain how
you would make the formats more similar?
Best Regards,
Ifat.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
