Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:10:53PM +0000, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > >> Lastly, election officials are also reachable through the >> #openstack-election Freenode channel. > > I wonder if it's worth having all conversations in #openstack-dev? > > There are pros and cons to both. > > Having a single purpose election channel certainly make it easy to spot > election activity > Using openstack-dev increases the possibility of braoder reach. > > I don't have a strong opionion either way.
At the very least it should happen in a logged channel. I think reusing #openstack-dev for this is fine -- it's an activity that is limited in time (so doesn't need a permanent channel) and -dev is pretty inactive those days. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
