Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-13 16:07:46 -0500:
> On 09/13/2016 03:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-13 15:09:39 -0500:
> >> On 09/13/2016 02:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2016-09-13 15:23:08 -0400:
> >>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/
> >>>>
> >>>> This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the 
> >>>> latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to 
> >>>> work" days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is 
> >>>> working.  Getting this restriction removed means we don't have to edit 
> >>>> away the tests for Kerberos in python3.
> >>>>
> >>>> "The requests-kerberos package was marked as available for only python 
> >>>> 2.6 and python 2.7 because pykerberos did not support python 3. This has 
> >>>> since been fixed, however we don't directly have a kerberos dependency 
> >>>> we can increase so just leave this unbound."
> >>>
> >>> Do we need an FFE for this or can it wait for Ocata? AFAIK, we aren't
> >>> supporting deployment on Python 3, yet, right?
> >>>
> >>> Doug
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think / thought keystone was supported on python 3 (maybe not all
> >> features in mitaka though).  I'm currently running it on python 3
> >> (through uwsgi).
> > 
> > Is there a gate job to back that up?
> > 
> > Doug
> > 
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > 
> It looks like there's a python3.4 job running for this mitaka review at
> least.  https://review.openstack.org/369618
> 

Those are unit tests. Do we have the functional tests or integration
tests running under 3.4 or 3.5?

Doug

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to