On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:22 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hello, all TCs,
> Understand that you will be quite busy in Barcelona summit, all TCs will be
> shown in the Barcelona summit, and meet together(usually, I assumed). So is
> it possible to have a chance to meet all TCs there for Tricircle big-tent
> application https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338796/ ? F2f talk to answer
> the concerns may help the understanding and decision.
> The splitting and cleaning of Tricircle hopefully could be finished before
> Barcelona summit.
> Although Tricircle splitting and cleaning is WIP, some draft materials were
> prepared for the understanding on Tricircle and open comments, contribution
> 1. Tricircle focuses on networking automation across
> 2. Tricircle design blueprint
> 3. Tricircle wiki update: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle
> (Caution: the git repo. of Tricircle will be purified, nova_apigw and
> cinder_apigw will be removed from the repo. soon
> https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/ , the description will also be
Just removing 2 functionality from repo probably would be fine.
But what you should clarify more is:
- How we should take care of existing commitments for those 2 functionality.
Some people still have been making patches for them.
And what I'm really confused with is that, even you're telling that we
will have removed those two from repo, you're still talking about
those two in different thread with no clarification.
That should be stopped now, if we will really go with what you
proposed above. Probably it's better not to say Tricircle any more to
avoid any confusion.
You should make a progress more *carefully* because project is being
changed with contributors who have been submitting patches eve now.
> Best Regards
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)