On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:03:31PM +0100, Dave Walker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not convinced it needs changing. [security] is a pretty logical topic > tag, and rolls off the keyboard quite easily. > > So the real issue is filtering on headers. Most mail providers do provide > this, and certainly MUA.. however gmail does make it a bit harder. > > Mailman wont see all arbitrary "[strings]", but the ones that are added > allows the user to subscript specifically to them. [security] is one such > tag, which means that OSSP interested parties could subscribe > *specifically* to that tag (and probably [all] for good measure). > > However, this does mean that these subscribers have little chance of seeing > any other mail. What would be better would be to add labels (gmail > terminology) specifically to [security] threads. > > Mailman does add an X- field such as: > "X-Topics: foo Security bar"
Well you learn something everyday ... today it just started early ;) I had a look at http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openstack-dev which will list the topics setup and it's far from exhustive, for example '[all]' isn't there :( I don't want to start a flood of requests to the Infrastructure team but we might want to expand the list a little. Personally I'd like to see all and stable added. We can avoid adding election as a topic if the election officials use '[all][election]' in the subject line It's probably beneficial for the PTL to subscribe to cross-project. Yours Tony.  Which, speaking only for myself, I'm happy to do  Assuming All is added as a topic
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev