On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:19:46PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-10-03 16:11:25 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> [...]
> > I think we can bring this thread to a close now. Upstream deleted
> > the broken wheel from PyPI a little over an hour ago, and within
> > about 5 minutes it disappeared from our CI system mirrors as well
> > (PyPI deletions propagate automatically through our mirroring). At
> > this point things _should_ be back to normal, and projects can
> > probably start working on reverting or abandoning any temporary
> > workarounds.
> 
> I just learned that we (unnecessarily) also copy available wheels
> from PyPI into our separate wheel mirrors when building
> architecture-specific wheels as a side effect of trivially reusing
> the wheel cache to populate it. Since those mirrors are effectively
> append-only we ended up persisting a copy of the broken wheel there
> even after it vanished from our PyPI mirror, and so it continued to
> be found by jobs in our CI system.
> 
> In the past few minutes I've cleared out vestigial copies of it
> there, and we're reflecting on ways we can enhance our wheel
> building jobs to omit duplication of wheels which are already
> present on PyPI (which would be more intuitive and avoid situations
> like this one). As far as I can tell things seem to be working in
> the gate behind the constraints revert[*] now.

So it seems to me that we can revert:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+NOT+branch:master+project:openstack/requirements+topic:bug/1629830
?

Yours Tony.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to