Guys, thanks for the suggestions! I like the coma separation as well, it's the closest to the ISO style. Let me propose the update.
Cheers, milan čt 6. 10. 2016 v 19:28 odesílatel Jay Pipes <[email protected]> napsal: > On 10/06/2016 11:43 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-10-06 10:30:30 -0500 (-0500), Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > > [...] > >> Problem with that is that ':' is a valid character within an ISO date, > >> though I do like the 'between' prefix. Now, '/' can be used if it's URL > >> encoded, but I agree that that is non-ideal. How about a syntax > >> something like: > >> > >> ?finished_at=between:ISO_DATE_A@ISO_DATE_B > &finished_at=between:ISO_DATE_C@ISO_DATE_D > > > > I'll admit I'm not up on the intricacies of URL expectations for > > APIs, but why not just use a comma? That's not an unusual meaning > > for it as punctuation (at least in English), and has the property > > that it's not overloading a typical field separator within either > > 8601 or HTTP encodings. (Now I've fulfilled my bikeshed quota for > > the month.) > > Yup, ++ on a comma. > > -jay > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
