On 7 October 2016 at 19:53, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote: > > My hope was that it would be "the summit without the noise". Sounds like > it will be "the summit without the noise, or the organization". > > I'd really like to see time boxes for most if not all of it, even if many > of the boxes are just half a day of "work time" which means "we want to > work on stuff together without the overhead of less involved participants." > > The two days of cross project is awesome. But there are also big > single-project initiatives that have cross-project interest anyway. > > For instance, the movement of the scheduler out of Nova is most definitely > a Nova session, but it has ramifications for oslo, performance, neutron, > cinder, architecture, API-WG, etc. etc. If we don't know when Nova is > going to discuss it, how can we be there to influence that discussion?
I've got to agree entirely here. I am mostly interested in cinder stuff, but I've interest and a stake in specific nova and glance topics... getting involved in those is going to be impossible without some sort of schedule. -- Duncan Thomas
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
