Hello ironic!

At today's IRC meeting, the questions "what should and should not be a project be under Ironic's governance" and "what does it mean to be under Ironic's governance" were raised. Log here:


http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2016/ironic.2016-10-17-17.00.log.html#l-176

See http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/ironic.html for a list of projects currently under Ironic's governance.

Is it as simple as "any project that aides in openstack baremetal deployment should be under Ironic's governance"? This is probably too general (nova arguably fits here) but it might be a good starting point.

Another angle to look at might be that a project belongs under the Ironic governance when both Ironic (the main services) and the candidate subproject would benefit from being under the same governance. A hypothetical example of this is when Ironic and the candidate project need to release together.

Just some initial thoughts to get the ball rolling. What does everyone else think?

Thanks,
Mike Turek


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to