Chris and Haomeng, thanks for your past reviews and I look forward to your return to the core team.
For the folks that are clearly reviewing far more than others, what do you think about asking them not to review so much? I'd vote for that :) --ruby From: Jim Rollenhagen <[email protected]> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 6:09 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <[email protected]> Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Core team updates Hey friends, The ironic-core team has done some great things over the last year. We've landed a ton of code, grown some new members (and continually growing more), and generally stayed pretty well connected. However, some folks are clearly reviewing far more than others. While I realize that folks may have commitments outside of ironic, I'd like to ask everyone to be mindful of their review quantity (and always quality, of course). :) Reviews for the ironic umbrella in the last 90 days: http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/ironic-group/90 A good rule of thumb to try to meet is 3 reviews/day, which our top 8 reviewers are meeting (admittedly I am not). There's also a couple people that haven't been active in the project for quite a while that I'm dropping today: Chris Krelle (NobodyCam) Haomeng Wang (haomeng) Of course, we welcome both of you back quickly if your activity picks back up. :) // jim __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
