On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Sven Anderson <s...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > On 25.10.2016 14:28, Ryan Brady wrote: > > I feel the logo draft is missing a lot of the detail and fidelity of our > > current logo. > > The draft logo has lines that are much too thick especially in the face > > area. It's > > recognizable from a shorter distance than our current logo. > > > > Our current logo has more of a cartoon / angry birds type feel to it - > > something > > with personality. To me, the draft logo is devoid of personality. I > > understand why > > the foundation wants to have more consistency between logos, but I'm > hoping > > this isn't the final design approach. > > to balance the feedback a bit: I like the new logo. I'm sure it could be > improved, but in general I think it qualifies as a logo, while the old > version does not really from my perspective. Logos _have_ to be sparse > in detail and still expressive. How is the current draft logo expressive? What does it express to you? - Ryan > That's what differentiates it from a > normal drawing. > > Cheers, > > Sven > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Ryan Brady Cloud Engineering rbr...@redhat.com 919.890.8925
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev