Hello, Arne Each share driver has capability called "storage_protocol". So, for case you describe, you should just define such extra spec in your share type that will match value reported by desired backend[s].
It is the purpose of extra specs in share types, you (as cloud admin) define its connection yourself, either it is strong or not. Valeriy On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Arne Wiebalck <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > We’re preparing the use of Manila in production and noticed that there > seems to be no strong connection > between share types and share protocols. > > I would think that not all backends will support all protocols. If that’s > true, wouldn’t it be sensible to establish > a stronger relation and have supported protocols defined per type, for > instance as extra_specs (which, as one > example, could then be used by the Manila UI to limit the choice to > supported protocols for a given share > type, rather than maintaining two independent and hard-coded tuples)? > > Thanks! > Arne > > -- > Arne Wiebalck > CERN IT > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Kind Regards Valeriy Ponomaryov www.mirantis.com [email protected]
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
