On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 09:25, Takashi Yamamoto <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 05:26, Takashi Yamamoto <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet.
>>>> newton jobs failures are false alarms.
>>>>
>>>> branching has been delayed because development of some futures
>>>> planned for newton has not been completed yet.
>>>>
>>>> the plan is to revert ocata-specific changes after branching newton.
>>>
>>> I don’t think it’s a good idea since you will need to tag a release on 
>>> branch creation, that is supposed to be compatible with next releases in 
>>> that same branch.
>>
>> can't we create the tag after the revert?
>>
>
> No, that’s release team requirement that they branch on a release tag.

ok, i didn't know the requirement. thank you.

>
>> anyway no one think this is a good idea.
>> it's just an unfortunate compromise we ended up.
>> we are trying to make the schedule better for next release.
>
> It would make more sense to tag on a compatible commit from the past and 
> consider it a first stable release. (Of course it means that feature 
> development would need to be aligned appropriately.)

in that case, can we backport the features?
(namely qos and lbaas drivers are in my mind)

>
> I see that subprojects do the same mistake over and over (the previous time 
> it was sfc, but I’ve heard similar concerns from bgpvpn). I believe that we 
> should set clear expectations for all stadium participants about when they 
> first stable releases happen and when branches are created. The current lack 
> of guidelines for participants just makes it harder for the core team to 
> maintain the setting, and for subprojects to become good citizens.
>
> Ihar

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to