Sounds good to me ☺ From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 10:43 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [ALU] [openstack-dev] [vitrage] common vs utils
Currently, we have `common/utils.py`, `common/file_utils.py` and an empty module `utils` in `vitrage`. In my understanding, `common` means common to vitrage package and utils are more general purpose utility functions. Would it better that we move `utils.py`, `file_utils.py` and `datetime_utils.py` to `utils`? -- Yujun
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
