On 23/11/16 17:58, Zane Bitter wrote:
I also investigated another issue, which is that since the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1388140 landed (in Kilo) I believe we are validating nested stacks multiple times (specifically, m times, where m is the stack's depth in the tree):root child grandchild create -> validate ----------> validate --------------> validate -> Resource.create ===> create -> validate ----------> validate -> Resource.create ===> create -> validate The only good news here is that ResourceGroup is smart enough to make sure that it generates a nested stack with at most 1 resource to validate when validate() is called. (However, when the nested stack is created, and thus validated, it is of course full-sized.) Autoscaling groups make no such allowances, but the patch above should actually have the same effect. (We can't get rid of the special case for ResourceGroup though, because of index substitution.) An obvious fix would be to disable validation - or, more specifically, validation of _resources_ - on create/update for stacks that have a non-null owner_id (i.e. nested stacks), so that we had something like: root child grandchild create -> validate ----------> validate --------------> validate -> Resource.create ===> create -> Resource.create ===> create That would eliminate the duplication/triplication/multiplication of validation. It would also mean that we'd cut out the expensive part of ResourceGroup validation with index substitution, leaving only the cheap part. One downside is that in the ResourceGroup/index substitution case we'd be creating resources whose definitions hadn't _ever_ been validated. I _think_ that's safe, in the sense that you'd just hear about errors later, as opposed to everything falling over in a heap, but it's difficult to be certain. Hearing about problems late is also not ideal (since it may cause otherwise-healthy siblings to be cancelled), but I would guess that heavy users like TripleO developers would say that it's worth the tradeoff.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645336 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403828/ - ZB __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
