Or probably when we clone a consistency group from a snapshot we
should clone all the images in this consistency group?

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Victor Denisov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Xing,
>
> One more question. You mentioned that there is an operation: create
> consistency group from a snap shot.
> Does it mean that an image can be a member of several consistency groups?
>
> Thanks,
> V.
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:21 AM, yang, xing <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You cannot remove a volume completely if there is still a group snapshot.  
>> You can remove the volume from the group but you can’t delete the volume 
>> because it still has snapshot dependent on it.  So if you want to completely 
>> remove a volume that is in a group, you can delete the group snapshot first 
>> which will delete the individual snapshot.  After that you can remove the 
>> volume from the group and delete the volume.
>>
>> More comments inline below.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xing
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Victor Denisov [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 12:04 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Cc: Jason Dillaman
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph
>>
>> One more question. What is the expected behavior if you remove a
>> volume completely?
>> [Xing] You cannot remove the volume completely (delete volume won't succeed) 
>> if there is still a group snapshot.
>>
>> Should the group snapshot removed first? Should the volume snapshot be
>> removed from the group snapshot?
>> [Xing] Yes, you should delete the group snapshot first and that will delete 
>> the volume snapshot as well.
>>
>> Should we keep the snapshot even if the image doesn't exist anymore?
>> [Xing] You cannot delete the image (volume) if there is still a snapshot.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Victor.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:02 AM, yang, xing <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Victor,
>>>
>>> Please see my answers inline below.
>>>
>>> In Newton, we added support for Generic Volume Groups.  See doc below.  CGs 
>>> will be migrated to Generic Volume Groups gradually.  Drivers should not 
>>> implement CGs any more.  Instead, it can add CG support using Generic 
>>> Volume Group interfaces.  I'm working on a dev doc to explain how to do 
>>> this and will send an email to the mailing list when I'm done.  The Generic 
>>> Volume Group interface is very similar to CG interface, except that the 
>>> Generic Volume Group requires an additional Group Type parameter to be 
>>> created.  Using Group Type, CG can be a special type of Generic Volume 
>>> Group.  Please feel free to grab me on Cinder IRC if you have any 
>>> questions.  My IRC handle is xyang or xyang1.
>>>
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/blockstorage-groups.html
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Xing
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Victor Denisov [[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:29 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc: Jason Dillaman
>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm working on consistency groups feature in ceph.
>>> My question is about what kind of behavior does cinder expect from
>>> storage backends.
>>> I'm particularly interested in what happens to consistency groups
>>> snapshots when I remove an image from the group:
>>>
>>> Let's imagine I have a consistency group called CG. I have images in
>>> the consistency group:
>>> Im1, Im2, Im3, Im4.
>>> Let's imagine we have snapshots of this consistency group:
>>>
>>> CGSnap1
>>> CGSnap2
>>> CGSnap3
>>>
>>> Snapshots of individual images in a consistency group snapshot I will call
>>> CGSnap2Im1 - Snapshot of image 1 from consistency group snapshot 2.
>>>
>>> Qustion 1:
>>> If consistency group CG has 4 images: Im1, Im2, Im3, Im4.
>>> Can CGSnap1 have more images than it already has: Im1, Im2, Im3, Im4, Im5.
>>>
>>> Can CGSnap1 have less images than it already has: Im1, Im2, Im3.
>>>
>>> [Xing]  Once a snapshot is taken from a CG, it can no longer be changed.  
>>> It is a point-in-time copy.  CGSnap1 cannot be modified.
>>>
>>> Question 2:
>>> If we remove image2 from the consistency group. Does it mean that
>>> snapshots of this image should be removed from all the CGSnaps.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> We are removing Im2.
>>> CGSnaps look like this:
>>>
>>> CGSnap1 - CGSnap1Im1, CGSnap1Im2, CGSnap1Im3
>>> CGSnap2 - CGSnap2Im1, CGSnap2Im2, CGSnap2Im3, CGSnap3Im4
>>> CGSnap3 - CGSnap3Im1, CGSnap3Im2, CGSnap3Im3, CGSnap3Im4
>>>
>>> What happens to snapshots: CGSnap1Im2,CGSnap2Im2, CGSnap3Im2? Do we
>>> remove them, do we keep them. Is it important what we do to them at
>>> all?
>>>
>>> [Xing] If your CG contains 4 volumes when you take the snapshot of the CG, 
>>> the resulting CGSnap should be associated with 4 snapshots corresponding to 
>>> the 4 volumes.  If you add more volumes to the CG or remove volumes from CG 
>>> after CGSnap was taken, it should not affect CGSnap.  It will only affect 
>>> CG snapshots that you take in the future.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Victor.
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to