On 12/10/16 12:56 PM, Andrey Pavlov wrote: > Hello, > > Can you also review this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401277/ > for bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1644177
Hi Andrey. If you review some of the priority items below, I'm sure someone will take a look at your patch. cheers, brian > And please consider backport to Newton. > > This bug is very annoying for deployments with several controllers and > glance over cinder... > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Brian Rosmaita <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> As discussed at the Glance weekly meeting yesterday, the priorities for >> 12/1 through 12/8, unfortunately look very similar to last week's >> priorities. Some core reviewers need to step up. The priorities are: >> >> Highest priority >> ================ >> >> (1) database strategy for rolling upgrades: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331740/ >> This one has a video to enhance your reviewing pleasure and demonstrate >> that the approach described actually is workable: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4iwJRlPqOw >> >> (2) glance expand/contract migrations with alembic: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374278/ >> We need another +2 on this one, preferably from a non-Rackspace person. >> >> (3) community images spec update: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396919/ >> New to the list. The latest patch includes the migration strategy for >> which Erno said indicated on the patch he'd change his -2 to a +2, so >> don't let the -2 on the patch stop you from reviewing it. >> >> The above three specs need to be reviewed as soon as possible. We are >> blocking Alex and Hemanth, because the Ocata database migration will >> handle the community images changes. >> >> >> Really high priority >> ==================== >> (would be highest if the specs were already approved) >> >> (4) Patch to fix a glance_store regression: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387719/ >> and patch to prevent a related backend misconfiguration: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388944/ >> >> (5) Patch to enable better request-id tracking: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352892/ >> This will be nice for operators, let's get it reviewed and merged! >> >> (6) Request for some insights and opinions for bug >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1585917 >> >> >> Please take a look >> ================== >> >> (7) glanceclient problem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319960/ >> >> thanks, >> brian >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
