Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > 5. Consider driver teams to be a completely different animal, defined > in drivers.yaml instead of projects.yaml (grey option) [6] > > This establishes drivers as second-order objects that are necessary > for the success of the main projects, and for which requirements > can be loosened. It would establish a new category of team without > the level playing-field requirement and some of the other team > requirements that seem not to apply to driver teams because they > are essentially a public facet of a single vendor.
Hi everyone, Over the last weeks we made progress on the reviews, and discussed the various options in a couple of TC meetings. At this point a majority of TC members is leaning toward an amended version of this "grey" proposal: https://review.openstack.org/403829 Please review and comment on it, so that we can refine it in time for the meeting next week. Unless a major issue is raised, we'll probably approve it then and make further adjustments as incremental changes. Thanks! -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev