On Nov 21, 2016, at 18:35, Tony Breeds <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all projects that meet one or more of the following > criteria: > > - The project is openstack-dev/devstack, openstack-dev/grenade or > openstack/requirements > - The project has the 'check-requirements' job listed as a template in > project-config:zuul/layout.yaml > - The project gates with either devstack or grenade jobs > - The project is listed in governance:reference/projects.yaml and is tagged > with 'stable:follows-policy'. > > > Some statistics: > All Repos : 1493 (covered in zuul/layout.yaml) > Checked Repos : 406 (match one or more of the above > criteria) > Repos with liberty branches : 305 > EOL Repos : 171 (repos that match the criteria *and* > have > a liberty branch) [1] > NOT EOL Repos : 134 (repos with a liberty branch but > otherwise do not match) [2] > DSVM Repos (staying) : 68 (repos that use dsvm but don't have > liberty branches) > Open Reviews : 94 (reviews to close) > > > Please look over both lists by 2016-11-27 00:00 UTC and let me know if: > - A project is in list 1 and *really* *really* wants to opt *OUT* of EOLing > and > why. Note doing this will amost certainly reduce the testing coverage you > have in the gate. > - A project is in list 2 that would like to opt *IN* to tagging/EOLing > > Any projects that will be EOL'd will need all open reviews abandoned before it > can be processed. I'm very happy to do this, or if I don't have permissios to > do it ask a gerrit admin to do it. > > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th and Dec > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup > zuul/layout.yaml > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs. > > Yours Tony. > > [1] > https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt-L1 > [2] > https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt-L181 > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
The Chef OpenStack cookbooks team is way late to the party. The cookbooks (openstack/cookbook-openstack-*, openstack/openstack-chef-repo ) should have had their liberty branches EOL’d. I have checked and no open reviews exist against liberty. -- Best, Samuel Cassiba
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
