On 1/5/17 3:17 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Tony Breeds <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:31:42PM -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> >>> I believe you asked in another thread (that I cannot locate) if it was >>> acceptable to the Glance team to not have an 11.0.3 tarball on >>> openstack.org. With Brian on vacation, I'm hoping the other stable >>> maintenance cores will chime in. I, for one, (as Release CPL and a >>> Stable branch core reviewer) don't think the tarballs are critical for >>> Glance. I'm fairly certain that most of the deployment projects use >>> the Git repository directly or Distro provided packages (which are >>> built from git tags). With that in mind, I don't think this should >>> block Glance being EOL'd. >> >> Sounds good. We can always generate and manually upload signed tarballs and >> wheels, we can't do it with our automated tools. >> >> I'll include glance projects in the next round of EOL requests to infra. >> >>> I'm sorry for the delay in my reply. I took a little over a week of >>> time off myself. >> >> No problem. It's that time of year. >> >> Yours Tony. >> >> > > ++ I think this is reasonable way forward. Thanks for your efforts! > > - jokke >
I agree with this proposal. thanks, brian __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
