On 01/06/2017 03:23 PM, Sam Yaple wrote:
This should be read as MariaDB+Galera for replication. It is a highly-available database.
Don't get me wrong. I love me some Galera. :) However, what the poster is really working towards is an implementation of the VCPE and eVCPE use cases for ETSI NFV. These use cases require a highly distributed compute fabric that can withstand long disruptions in network connectivity (between POPs/COs and the last mile of network service) while still being able to service compute and network functions at the customer premise.
Galera doesn't tolerate network disruption of any significant length of time. At all. If there is a Keystone services running on the customer premise that is connecting to a Galera database, and that Galera database's connectivity to its peers is disrupted, down goes the whole on-premise cloud fabric. And that's exactly what I believe the original poster is attempting to avoid. Thus my not understanding the choice here.
Best, -jay __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
