On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Zane Bitter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/01/17 16:58, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Thomas Herve <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Zane Bitter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's worth reiterating that TripleO still disables convergence in the
>>>> undercloud, so these are all tests of the legacy code path. It would be
>>>> great if we could set up a non-voting job on t-h-t with convergence
>>>> enabled
>>>> and start tracking memory use over time there too. As a first step,
>>>> maybe we
>>>> could at least add an experimental job on Heat to give us a baseline?
>>>
>>>
>>> +1. We haven't made any huge changes into that direction, but having
>>> some info would be great.
>>
>>
>> +1 too. I volunteer to do it.
>>
>> Quick question: to enable it, is it just a matter of setting
>> convergence_engine to true in heat.conf (on the undercloud)?
>
>
> Yep! Actually, it's even simpler than that: now that true is the default
> (Newton onwards), it's just a matter of _not_ setting it to false :)

done: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tripleo/heat/convergence

> - ZB
>
>> If not, what else if needed?
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Emilien Macchi

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to