On Wed, Jan 11 2017, William M Edmonds wrote: > After discussing with my team, I think we will need to propose a revert. > The deprecation process was not followed correctly here. We will start > working on moving to panko, but we are not sure we can contain that for > Ocata. Please follow the deprecation process correctly in future and we can > avoid this hassle for everyone.
I see nobody from IBM contributing to Telemetry, so I find it hard to read that kind of statement. There's also nobody working on Panko itself, so I don't think it's fair to ask for a revert and to the Ceilometer team to continue maintaining a software nobody wants to. -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
