>From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall be an independent project, with core contributors from both sides.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:11:42PM -0500, James Slagle wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > >> Greetings, > > >> > > >> With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about > the future of > > >> diskimage-builder as it relates to the tripleo project. > > >> > > >> Reading the recently approved spec for containers, container (image) > builds are > > >> no longer under the control of tripleo; by kolla. Where does this > leave > > >> diskimage-builder as a project under tripleo? I specifically ask, > because I'm > > >> wanting to start down the path of using diskimage-builder as an > interface to > > >> containers. > > >> > > >> Basically, is it time to move diskimage-builder out from the tripleo > project > > >> into another, or its own? Or is tripleo wanting to more forward on > development > > >> efforts on diskimage-builder. > > > > > > Looking at stats on who is actively contributing into DIB: > > > http://stackalytics.com/?module=diskimage-builder > > > > > > It seems that we have some folks from infra and some folks on dib > > > only, and a few contributors from TripleO. > > > > > > I guess the best option is to ask DIB contributors: do you want to own > > > the project you're committing to? > > > If not, is it something that should stay in TripleO (imo no) or move > > > into openstack-infra (imo yes, if infra agrees). > > > > > > With my PTL hat, I'm really open to this thing and I wouldn't mind to > > > transfer ownership to another group. > > > > I was under the impression it was already it's own project team based on: > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-July/099805.html > > > > It looks like the change was never made in governance however. > > > Yes, it just looks like Greg created new core reviewers, not officially > breaking > away from tripleo. > > If everybody is on board with moving diskimage-builder outside of tripleo, > we > need to decided where it lives. Two options come to mind: > > 1) Move diskimage-builder into own (big tent?) project. Setup a new PTL, > etc. > 2) Move diskimage-builder into openstack-infra (fungi PTL). > 3) Keep diskimage-builder under tripleo (EmilienM PTL). > > Thoughts? > > > The reason I -1'd Paul's TripleO spec and suggested it be proposed to > > diskimage-builder was due to: > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-June/098560.html > and > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336109/ > > > > I just want to make sure the right set of reviewers who are driving > > dib development see the spec proposal. > > > > -- > > -- James Slagle > > -- > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Yolanda Robla Mota NFV Partner Engineer yrobl...@redhat.com +34 605641639
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev