On 01/13/2017 09:25 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Gabriele Cerami <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> following a suggestion from Alal Pevec I'm proposing to stop using
>> "current" repo from dlrn and start using "consistent" instead.
>> The main difference should only be that "consistent" is not affected by
>> packages in ftbfs, so we're testing with a bit more stability.
> 
> We might want to exclude tripleo projects because we always need the
> latest on this case. Otherwise, lgtm.

The "current" repo being replaced is actually already only used for the
tripleo gated projects (and stable branches). We definitely need
"current" in the tripleo gated project case, and because we don't have a
special repo for only tripleo projects in the stable case, we need it
there too.

> 
>> This is the proposal
>> https://review.openstack.org/419455
>>
>> please comment especially if I did not understood correctly what the
>> difference between "current" and "consistent" is.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to