On 13 January 2017 at 10:47, Clint Byrum <[email protected]> wrote: > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-01-12 22:38:46 -0800: > > Kevin Benton wrote: > > > If you don't want users to specify network details, then use the get me > > > a network extension or just have them boot to a public (or other > > > pre-created) network. > > > > > > In your thought experiment, why is your iPhone app developer not just > > > using a PaaS that handles instance scaling, load balancing and HA? Why > > > would he/she want to spend time managing security updates and log > > > rotation for an operating system running inside another program > > > pretending to be hardware? Different levels of abstraction solve > > > different use cases. > > > > Fair point, probably mr/mrs iPhone app developer should be doing that. > > > > I totally disagree. If PaaS was the answer, they'd all be using PaaS. > > Maybe some day, but that's no excuse for having an overly complex story > for the base. I totally appreciate that "Get me a network" is an effort > to address this. But after reading docs on it, I actually have no idea > how it works or how to make use of it (I do have a decent understanding > of how to setup a default subnetpool as an operator). >
I'd be happy to improve the docs, but your feedback is not very actionable. Any chance you can elaborate on what you're struggling with? Thanks, Armando > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
