On 16/01/2017 14:33, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16 2017, Ian Cordasco wrote: > >> Related to the other thread I just started, I was looking at the >> project navigator [1] for Barbican and found some things that look >> wrong (to an outsider) and was hoping could be cleared up. > > Don't worry, we (Telemetry) have already asked for that to be updated > but nothing happened. I don't even recall that we had an answer about > how the page is managed. See this thread from October 2016: > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105617.html >
I have filed bugs on the foundation website launchpad [0] to get these fixed in the past. That said, there is problems with the navigator (like what levels are considered "mature", the choice of tags, etc) that make me just ignore it. It even considers our Juno release as "not deprecated" (in the API version history?) > The page misses components for us also. I feel bad that the foundation > Web site reflects bad data. It actually harms small projects that made > good progress achieving better at what is called "maturity" being still > wrongly noted 1/8. Yup. As a small project it is hard enough to keep up without losing out in such a public way. > Sigh. > > Cheers, > 0 - https://launchpad.net/openstack-org __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
