On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Joshua Harlow <[email protected]> wrote:
> Corey Bryant wrote: > >> >> Added [nova] and [oslo] to the subject. This is also affecting nova and >> oslo.middleware. I know Sean's initial response on the thread was that >> this shouldn't be a priority for ocata but we're completely blocked by >> it. Would those teams be able to prioritize a fix for this? >> >> > Is this the issue for that https://github.com/Pylons/webob/issues/307 ? > > Yes, at least for glance that is part of the issue, the dropping of the http_method_probably_has_body check. > If so, then perhaps we need to comment and work together on that and > introduce a fix into webob? Would that be the correct path here? What > otherwise would be needed to 'prioritize a fix' for it? > > That doesn't appear to be a bug in webob from what I can see in the issue 307 discussion, just a change of behavior that various projects need to adapt to if they're going to support webob 1.7.x. -- Regards, Corey
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
