On 2013-10-28 10:00:03 -0700 (-0700), Stefano Maffulli wrote: [...] > Probably then we should keep the notion of the CCLA in the User/Member > database then? The manager of the CCLA would click-sign the agreement on > our site, we keep the historic record of that signature and the manager > herself declares who works for her, authorized to commit. It would still > not prevent people to commit code without a CCLA but I htink it would > improve the situation. What do you think?
I'm hesitant to suggest that any of our CLAs solves any real problem (after all, I'm not a lawyer, so I only know what I've heard them say). That aside, I agree the member database sounds like it would be a sane place to deal with that, but until we actually see the source code for that site it's hard to be sure. -- Jeremy Stanley _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
