Stefano Maffulli <[email protected]> writes: > This lead us to give up trying for Hong Kong. We searched for > alternatives (see the infra meeting logs a few months back and my > personal experiments [1] based on UDS experience) and the only solid > one was to use a land line to call in the crucial people that *have to* > be in a session. In the end I and Thierry made a judgement call to drop > that too because we didn't hear anyone demanding it and setting them up > in a reliable way for all sessions required a lot of efforts (that in > the past we felt went wasted anyway). > > We decided to let moderators find their preferred way to pull in those > 1-3 people ad-hoc with their preferred methods.
Indeed, we have an asterisk server that we set up with the intent that it should be able to support a lot (we tested at least 100) simultaneous attendees for remote summit participation. But since Stefano and Thierry knew there was no interest, we did not do the final prep needed to support the summit. If people really are interested in remote participation, we would be happy to help with that using open source tools that are accessible to a large number of people over a wide range of technology. Please register your interest with the track leads, Stefano, or the infrastructure team a bit earlier before the next summit and it can happen. -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
