folks, any thoughts on how to make data-processing-specs shorter? :) On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Anita Kuno <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/20/2014 07:24 PM, James E. Blair wrote: >> Hi, >> >> At the project meeting today, I cornered the PTLs and got consensus that >> we should be using PROGRAM-specs as the name for the specs repos. Eg, >> "compute-specs" instead of "nova-specs". This is to better support >> programs with multiple projects (such as client and server projects). >> Short names (object instead of object-storage) are fine. >> >> If you review patches to create new specs repos, please keep that in >> mind. Also, we'll be scheduling renames of some existing specs repos >> when convenient. >> >> -Jim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> > Will do. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
-- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Sahara Technical Lead (OpenStack Data Processing) Mirantis Inc. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
