On 2014-09-15 14:36:59 +0000 (+0000), Sandy Walsh wrote: > For our group, the greatest value of StackForge is CLA management. [...]
Out of curiosity, why is that a value to your StackForge project(s)? About the only benefit I could see is for projects targeting future inclusion in an official OpenStack Program, so that they don't have to retroactively get the permission of the contributors or their respective employers when that time comes. > Honestly, I was kind of disappointed to lose our github > organization and having to mangle our repo names just for > organizational purposes. If your end goal is inclusion in OpenStack itself, then that was an inevitable organizational change anyway. OpenStack uses free software to manage its projects, so GitHub is out of the question. > Would it be possible to just expose/extend/enforce the CLA side of > StackForge to repos outside of stackforge git? I fail to see what this would accomplish. The OpenStack Individual Contributor License Agreement only makes sense within the context of actual present/future OpenStack projects (and many of us even question whether it makes sense there). -- Jeremy Stanley _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
