I think we would have MUCH better attendance if we changed the time from Monday. Most everyone in the summit session had heard of the meeting, but we only get 5 or so out of the 100+ possible. Everyone I have talked to agrees that the current time is not good, and that an additional time (or alternating meeting time) would be a great solution.
As far as it confusing people, I think my fellow Third-party CI operators are smart enough to figure it out. It seems to work fine for the >10 other work groups that have implemented this approach. If we can agree on Wednesday, that is a start. I am much more flexible on the meeting times on Wednesday and earlier or later than I proposed is no problem for me. So Anita is not in favor of my alternating time proposal. Anyone else? Thanks everyone! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Anita Kuno <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for all the responses so far. > > This is to find an *additional* meeting time. This is not to have > meeting times that switch from week to week. That would only confuse > people. We don't need that. Trying to find a meeting time that would > work for everybody doesn't work, hence the direction to create an > *additional* meeting time. That way if you miss one, you can attend > another. > > So far we have: > Josh's suggestion of 00:00am Tuesday UTC > Nurit's suggestion of Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00 > Salvadore's seconding of Josh's proposal > Trinath's suggestion of 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays > > 1400 and 2200 doesn't give us anything better than what we have. > > Based on conversations at the summit, I would really like to see if > Nurit and Josh can convene on an agreed time, I would really like to see > both of them being able to attend on a regular basis. > > If we tried to work with an 8:00 utc time, either Monday or Tuesday, > would that work for you, Josh and Nurit? (That would be 7pm in the > evening for you, Josh - I think - is that workable?) > > Thanks I appreciate the interest, > Anita. > > > On 12/02/2014 08:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it falls > > right around dinner time. > > It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over the > > pacific ocean. > > > > Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time > range > > most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic. > > Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but it > > might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially during > > winter. > > Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but might > > fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit uncomfortable for New > > Zealand during their summer. > > > > Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for > > eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if > > that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the > regular > > attendees come from those time zones. > > > > Regards, > > Salvatore > > > > On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. > >> > >> The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We > could > >> follow what other working groups have done, having alternating meeting > >> times to accommodate everyone. > >> > >> I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating > weeks: > >> Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 > >> Wednesday 2200 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 > >> > >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> HI, > >>> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more involved > if > >>> meetings would be earlier. > >>> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, will > be > >>> ideal for us. > >>> > >>> Nurit > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected] [mailto: > >>> [email protected]] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM > >>> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; > >>> [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > >>> Additional Meeting for third-party > >>> > >>> Hi- > >>> > >>> Its nice to have CI operators meetings. > >>> > >>> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > >>> [email protected] | extn: 4048 > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM > >>> To: openstack Development Mailing List; > >>> [email protected] > >>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for > >>> third-party > >>> > >>> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to > >>> start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from > >>> non-North American time zones. > >>> > >>> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The > >>> current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well > >>> since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that > works > >>> for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > >>> > >>> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, > he > >>> is in Australia. > >>> > >>> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested > >>> and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > >>> > >>> Thanks everyone, > >>> Anita. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
